A new court filing by longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone requesting the full Crowdstrike analysis discovered that the US government was given a redacted version of the report marked “Draft.”  Stone’s legal team also reveled that the FBI never reviewed the DNC server, and that the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report.

The US govt sanctions on Russia with trillions in damages based on unverified redacted draft of Crowdstrike Report with NO forensic evidence.

US Govt’s Entire Russia-DNC Hacking FALSE Narrative is Based On Redacted Draft Of Crowdstrike Report.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-16/us-governments-entire-russia-dnc-hacking-narrative-based-redacted-draft-crowdstrike

The DOJ informed the court it doesn’t have the unredacted Crowdstrike reports.

As the Conservative Treehouse notes: “This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party….. despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor.”

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/15/doj-admits-fbi-never-saw-crowdstrike-report-on-dnc-russian-hacking-claim/

Reply to Opposition, USA v. STONE, No. 1:19-cr-00018-1 (D.D.C. Jun 14, 2019)

https://www.scribd.com/document/413428947/Stone-De-123-DOJ-Response-to-MTC-Crowdstrike-Reports

The full intelligence apparatus of the United States government is relying on a report they have never even been allowed to see or confirm; that was created by a paid contractor for a political victim that would not allow the FBI to investigate their claim.

The DNC server issue is foundation, and cornerstone, of the U.S. government’s position on “Russia hacking” and the election interference narrative; and that narrative is based on zero factual evidence to affirm the U.S. government’s position. claiming that

…”the government does not need to prove at the defendant’s trial that the Russians hacked the DNC”… (pg 3)

Meanwhile, the Crowdstrike analyst who led forensics on the DNC servers is a former FBI employee who Robert Mueller promoted while head of the agency.

It should also be noted that the government of Ukraine admonished Crowdstrike for a report they later retracted and amended, claiming that Russia hacked Ukrainian military.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-16/us-governments-entire-russia-dnc-hacking-narrative-based-redacted-draft-crowdstrike

Let’s not forget that in December 2015 the DNC accused Bernie Sanders campaign in breaching the DNC database.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-berned-is-bernie-sanders-by-the-dnc-data-breach/

Sanders sued the DNC and they settled out of court.

I guess they planed to make Bernie Sanders to be the subject of the “Russia collusion” hoax, but later switched to Donald Trump.

The featured image shows a logo of the Crowdstrike in the colors of the Bandera ultra-nationalist Ukranian Insurgent army that during the WWII German occupation committed acts of genocide of Poles, Russians, Belorussians and other minorities on the territory of Poland and Western Ukraine.

patrion image